The form of proving the marriage of non – Muslims
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
Form of a claim to prove a conjugal bond
That day …. Corresponding to / 2019
Established on the student of Ms. / ………………… .. Nationality: Egyptian Religion: Muslim Number of nationality: …………………. Governorate.
The selected office is the office of Professor H / Hameem Gomaa Salem, which is located in 26 buildings of Beicho American City – Zahraa El Maadi – Cairo The capital of Egypt The capital of the Arab Republic of Egypt The capital of the Arab Republic of Egypt.
I am ——- … Court Minutes ………………………… .. I have moved and declared: –
Mr. / ………………….. and resident in: ——- …………….. ..
Addressing / ………………………………………………………………………
And announced it as follows
The form of proving the marriage of non – Muslims
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
– The applicant and the advertiser are bound by a valid marriage and a valid marriage certificate according to the proper and legitimate customary marriage voucher dated 2017 AD and the name of the dowry is urgent and postponed while in between – and since that marriage has been true and complete for all its pillars and its legitimate conditions and the book of Allah and His Messenger And peace), and that the written agreement was valid from the point of view of legitimacy. This marriage was done in the presence of two witnesses who were also removed by signing the written agreement as witnesses: 1 …………………… 2 …. On the validity of that written agreement and marriage based on the provisions of Islamic law. – Since the matter also and that the plaintiff submitted to the Office of Family Dispute Settlement Court … … for the family request settlement number ………. / 2017 and established the current action in exchange for the accused student at the conclusion of the proof of marital union between them and between the accused and this written agreement dated in / 2, which states that the marriage was in accordance with Islamic law and true legislation, where it was valid in terms of affirmation and approval And the certificate and publicity. Both the plaintiff and the accused were in full legal capacity at the time of conclusion of the written agreement, and the provider of the benefits of reaching the parties the legal age of marriage.
– Legal evidence: The plaintiff seeks the right of the judiciary to accept the case in form and in the matter by proving the marital union in accordance with the declaration of the marriage partner in the face of the written agreement council: which requires the judiciary to accept the lawsuit in accordance with the law and the provisions of the Court of Cassation. And its amendments by Law No. 1 of 2000, which states:
The claims arising from the marriage slip shall not be accepted if the marriage is less than six years of age or the age of the spouse is less than eight ten calendar years at the time of the claim and does not accept the denial of claims arising from the marriage voucher in subsequent events on the first of August 1931 Marriage is not fixed by a government document. However, divorce or annulment is accepted according to the circumstances, without any other, if the marriage is fixed in any writing and does not accept the annulment of the marital relationship between the spouses of the sect and the mother unless their legislation permits it) In the face of your justice we find that The plaintiff and the accused have reached the legal age of marriage provided for in the first article of that article. Since it is clear that the legislator may deliberately add a word to denial, it only means that when denying the existence of a marital relationship between him and the Koran can be proved in exchange for this only a government document, but the signature does not require the legislator a specific situation where it is not necessary to Proof of the marital association with a government paper as long as the defendant (the qurain) has been approved within the written agreement board and where the defendant came in person and approved the marital relationship and that what is used in the article (17) of the said legislation that he does not accept the marital action with regard to denial and But it is also used to be accepted in case of signature. This means that if the street did not mean that meaning, it would have been better not to add a word (in denial), in contrast to the fact that the original is the approval of any claim except what is excluded by a special text and this means that the article of the previous article is an exception from the publisher of the news wanted by a specific destination legislator In itself, is that with regard to denial, the case can only be accepted by a government document, ie, in case of denial, it can only be proven against a government card.
The form of proving the marriage of non – Muslims
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
– The Egyptian Court of Cassation has directed that:
(The case may not be ruled against the consent of the case and if a government document does not provide marriage, if the accused consents to the marriage, the signature relied upon in that order, and what was done by the Court of Cassation – is the ratification obtained in the Judicial Council,
(Rev. 30/5/2007 session year 18 No. 3 p. 1193)
In this ruling, the Egyptian Court of Cassation has contested and showed Nia the legislator of article 17 of the above-mentioned legislation, in that it does not require the submission of a government document to prove the marital union as long as the spouse has recognized the marital relationship. This means that the principle of presenting the government paper Marital marriage is an exception
Originally posted 2019-07-22 06:05:13.
