On the day corresponding to the hour
Construction at the invitation of Ms.. Al-Salam neighborhood, Kafr Saqr, Sharqiya, and its chosen premises. Teachers’ office: Mohamed Mostafa, Mohamed El Haddad, lawyers in Kafr Saqr.
I am the record of the District Court has moved in the past time referred to above on any where – the street insured – nationalism – Zagazig and announced:
Resisting the rule of proving the marriage of foreigners
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
The most famous lawyer in Egypt – Hayam Gomaa Salem 01061680444
the master/ ……………………………. Addressing with
Subject
The appellant held a number of 226 for the year 2009, the family of Kafr Saqr requested at the conclusion of her marriage to the advertiser under the written written agreement of 26/3/2009 and this by virtue of accelerated access and without bail with the obligation of the expenses and against the efforts of lawyers.
The court decided to reject the lawsuit, and since that ruling was not accepted by the applicant renewed, it is the initiative to challenge him by way of Appeal for reasons of faulty implementation of legislation and corruption in the inference and unconstitutionality Article 5 Article 2 of legislation 103 of 1976 regarding the report on the marriage of foreigners in the Arab Republic of Egypt, it states the following in its statement,
First: the mistake in implementing the legislation
As evidenced by the newspaper and its documents that the appellant and the advertiser have a legitimate marriage association under a written agreement legal marriage has met the various determinants and rules necessary for the marriage is true of the positive and acceptance between the parties; and the presence of witnesses of justice, it is legitimate and law and according to the doctrine of the tap in force valid marriage valid It is necessary whether the marriage voucher is written in a government paper or not originally written in a paper.
Since marriage and according to what is planned in the established jurisprudence of Hanafi proves that one of three (certificate, ratification, denial of the right)
Since the parties to the dispute were present both in person and with a lawyer, and the plaintiff admitted that the marriage had been obtained and in addition to the validity of the marriage, and that the judgment was contrary to the validity of the ratification, it is flawed in the implementation of the legislation for violating the provisions of article 103, 104 of the ” In the face of the judiciary with a legal reality claimed by him and this during the proceedings in connection with that incident “- Article 103 of the legislation of evidence.
“Ratification argument is interrupted on the order, and the ratification of the author is not only if the focus on a variety of facts and the existence of reality does not necessarily require the existence of other events,” – Article 104 of the legislation of evidence.
Since the judgment was contrary to that view and did not respect the validity of ratification as a means of proving the marriage, it had been wrong to implement the legislation.
Second: Corruption in the inference
In notification of that obeisance, the judgment in which the case was dismissed would have been corrupt in its reasoning when it decided that my parties
The amendments did not fulfill the provisions of Article 5, Section 2, of Law 103 of 1976 regarding a report